The Conservative Party could have instituted such a shift post-Brexit and would have solidified their position with the electorate. I’ll never understand why they did not.
Bribery, back-loaded and laundered through several layers of "non-profits?" Fanatical, universalist ideology, even at the expense of political victory?
I don't know either. We're not in the club so I guess we'll never know.
Boris Johnson, too much of an attention-seeker to have the moral determination to send migrants back?
That Rishi Sunak's government wouldn't be serious about a White Britain policy is too obvious to bother with.
Why did Teresa May fail to deport migrants and move towards a White Britain policy?
By the time of the July 2024 election, enough White British people were fed up with this Conservative Party they voted tactically to try to destroy it.
They think race, religion and upbringing doesn't count. If it makes demographic younger, that's it - go ahead! It's not uncommon to find older folks therefore vote for pro-immigration parties.
It's kind of rational, if you rely on the "experts", argument.
We all know it doesn't, and they do too. Plenty of data to prove it. So why continue? They are getting rich off it. I'm still a bit squeamish to agree they do it as punishment to natives but it is harder to not see it that way as time goes on.
Were the UK's anti-migrant, White riots of August 2024 (after the election) a turning-point towards immigration restriction?
There has been something of a sustained street-politics movement ever since the riots, by similar people but without the lawless violence of the 2024 riots.
What % of Denmark residents in 2025 are of non-Danish / non-NW-Europe / non-European origin?
How does this compare with similar countries?
This is the important question.
Trump once said off the cuff, in his usual style, that he wanted his big beautiful wall to have a wide gate and hoped to see LEE-GULL immigrants "in the highest numbers ever."
There is still, I think, a good chance of a big Trump Betrayal of exactly that kind. Cracking down on illegals to some degree but offsetting any gains by increasing legal migrants, amounting to a big shell game.
What we want is a policy that seeks to stabilize and if possible increase the ethnocultural core share-of-population, not shell games and a well-oiled, wide-open gate.
I think Denmark's stock of non-Westerners is on the same "order of magnitude" as other similarly-placed countries'. Maybe less, but showing the same tendencies. Maybe someone can tease of race data in the Denmark govt. statistical databased.
I'll believe them when they get to pre-Brexit immigration levels. My guess is this is all media posturing and the Home Office is going to continue rubber-stamping every family reunification and student visa, while judges refuse to deport illegals since they might have to shave their beard (real reason a Tajik was allowed to stay).
As Mark Steyn has pointed out repeatedly, if the will of the people can't be satisfied by the ballot box, the people will be forced to take less acceptable means to achieve it! Cheers to the Danes for listening to their people instead of telling them what to think. Maybe the idea will catch on!
I'll take "Things That will Never Happen" for $1000, Ken.
Shabana Mahmood is a Muslim.
Mohammed and its variations are the top name for boys in the UK.
England's second largest city is Birmingham and it is 40% Muslim.
Britain imported 3-4 million Muslims, mostly Pakis, since 2020.
Starmer's government has been relentless in prosecuting speech criticizing anything Muslim, while letting he Muzzies do what they want. A man was recently told not to walk his dog on a certain street because it might offend the Muzzies.
The Muzzies have been raping white English girls for over 20 years now, and it is still being covered up because no one wants to be racist. Imagine the reaction if the roles were reversed.
Mark Steyn has been banging on about this since the early 2000s. It is probably too late to avoid civil war.
Machine gunning a refugee boat and posting the video online might help.
There is no such thing as "temporary" asylum. People from El Salvador have been on Temporary Protected Status in the US since the late 80s.
The Muzzies now have a foot hold in NYC and Dearborn Michigan.
Don't forget the massive numbers of Somalis in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota and, what, Maine and other places in New England. Those nice Lutheran church ladies—gotta love 'em.
> t comes as a further 1,269 migrants crossed the English Channel in small boats on Thursday and Friday, the latest Home Office figures show. This follows two weeks of bad weather when there were no crossings.
Shabana Mahmood sent officials to Denmark to study its immigration system <
I get annoyed with all this nonsense that this requires careful "study" and all sorts of rules--even reasonable ones like the Danes--are required.
What an absolute crock of shit. There is absolutely no requirement to let *any* foreigners into your country. In fact, it is a dereliction of your duty to your citizens if said foreigner's presence is not a long term benefit to your nation's people. (Which is very rare.)
Simply *do not let them in* ... and the problem completely vanishes. Completely, "small boats" and all.
Hasn't Germany been paying reparations since the 50's in one way or another? Up to the point where the Russians started to squeeze them Germany was the economic powerhouse of Europe.
We American conservatives like to imagine that we are sane, manly, gun-toting, based normies compared to those wimpy, socialist Euro-weenies.
But while Europe is indeed a mess--collapsing quickly--the polling shows that Europeans are actually much more based about demographics/immigration. Many more Euros seem to have a strong sense of their nation ethnic identity and its importance.
Even in the disastrous UK--which has the misfortune to have be pickled of US minoritarian propaganda since the War and has totalitarian finger waging, church lady elites--people are more based. Conservatives there actually want to stay white and British!
And skipping over to the flip side of the Anglo-sphere, in Australia--which is abolishing itself about as fast as Canada--a majority of people of *every political party*--from Pauline Hanson's "One Nation", through the Nats/Libs, through Labor and even the Greens--want less immigration.
Of course, the Labor government is not going to do that. It claims instead it will "manage the effects" or something. But the *people*--despite all the propaganda--trend somewhat sane.
In contrast in the US, we can muster a majority against *illegal* immigration and Democrat voters--as just demonstrated--are against cooperating with Trump to do even that.
BTW count me as skeptical of anything coming from this government.
This turd Keir Starmer, while he comes across as a bowl of rice pudding with his permanent deer-in-the-headlights look, is an avid true believer in all the "Human Rights" glop. He worked his way up the greasy pole lots of "human rights" lawfare. He's a born yard-signer type. Just loves legalist process.
He turned over the Chagos Islands--to people who have absolutely nothing to do with the Chagos Islanders--because some international busy-body court told him to.
His one-in-one-out deal with France to handle channel invaders is the dumbest "fix" imaginable. Basically when an invader shows up Starmer may send him back to France ... but in return agrees to take in an invader who has filed asylum paperwork in France. In order words--math is hard!--everytime a migrant shows up someone is getting in, even if not that guy.
Starmer is the anti-thesis of a "just do it", "get a wrench and fix the problem" type guy. Starmer would easily be the worst British Prime Minister ever ... if it weren't for all the previous Labor PM's who kicked off and ramped up this immivasion tsunami and all the Tory PMs who did absolutely nothing to stop it.
I'm certainly all for it. We did a soccer trip and stopped and stadiums in Birmingham and Luton and let's just say we could have been in Karachi and Islamabad.
That being said, I have never seen anyone work harder than Mexican roofers. Dawn to past dusk. They put in a shift. Conversely, i hired the lowest bidder to install patio pavers. The white laborer was an hour late with DTs. <1% chance that dude makes it to 60.
The dudes who dug the Erie canal turned out to be great citizens. The dudes who moved to Rotterdam not so much.
There has to be more choices besides human caravans and armed and masked agents grabbing preschools teachers in front of 3 year olds.
The Conservative Party could have instituted such a shift post-Brexit and would have solidified their position with the electorate. I’ll never understand why they did not.
Bribery, back-loaded and laundered through several layers of "non-profits?" Fanatical, universalist ideology, even at the expense of political victory?
I don't know either. We're not in the club so I guess we'll never know.
To say something obvious: The reason the Conservative Party failed must be attributed to its leaders.
British prime ministers since Brexit (each had problems preventing aggressive immigration-restriction momentum):
-- Teresa May, July 2016 to July 2019
-- Boris Johnson, July 2019 to Sept 2022
-- Liz Truss, Sept 2022 to Oct 2022
(Liz Truss thrown out in a palace coup led by several scheming minister of South Asian-origin, leading to...)
-- Rishi Sunak, Oct 2022 to July 2024
(July 2024 election, mass-scale right-wing defection nearly wipes out Conservative Party)
-- Keir Starmer, July 2024 to Present
Boris Johnson, too much of an attention-seeker to have the moral determination to send migrants back?
That Rishi Sunak's government wouldn't be serious about a White Britain policy is too obvious to bother with.
Why did Teresa May fail to deport migrants and move towards a White Britain policy?
By the time of the July 2024 election, enough White British people were fed up with this Conservative Party they voted tactically to try to destroy it.
Because the legal environment is very pro-immigration and because they wanted to shore up their pension system
how does it shore up the pension system?
They think race, religion and upbringing doesn't count. If it makes demographic younger, that's it - go ahead! It's not uncommon to find older folks therefore vote for pro-immigration parties.
It's kind of rational, if you rely on the "experts", argument.
We all know it doesn't, and they do too. Plenty of data to prove it. So why continue? They are getting rich off it. I'm still a bit squeamish to agree they do it as punishment to natives but it is harder to not see it that way as time goes on.
"it was more crucial to the ruling class to denounce people Brita like mw=s as the Bad Guys"
I am trying to come up with something clever for what "people Brita like mw=s" might mean but so far have come up empty.
I hope you find enlightenment on this. I don't expect to. Just more Artificial Ignorance?
Were the UK's anti-migrant, White riots of August 2024 (after the election) a turning-point towards immigration restriction?
There has been something of a sustained street-politics movement ever since the riots, by similar people but without the lawless violence of the 2024 riots.
"It didn't need to be this way."
Nope. It's just now. Maybe it's Fear of God (or Farage).
What % of Denmark residents in 2025 are of non-Danish / non-NW-Europe / non-European origin?
How does this compare with similar countries?
This is the important question.
Trump once said off the cuff, in his usual style, that he wanted his big beautiful wall to have a wide gate and hoped to see LEE-GULL immigrants "in the highest numbers ever."
There is still, I think, a good chance of a big Trump Betrayal of exactly that kind. Cracking down on illegals to some degree but offsetting any gains by increasing legal migrants, amounting to a big shell game.
What we want is a policy that seeks to stabilize and if possible increase the ethnocultural core share-of-population, not shell games and a well-oiled, wide-open gate.
Yes, but from Norway, South Africa, and the like, not "shit hole" countries.
I think Denmark's stock of non-Westerners is on the same "order of magnitude" as other similarly-placed countries'. Maybe less, but showing the same tendencies. Maybe someone can tease of race data in the Denmark govt. statistical databased.
I'll believe them when they get to pre-Brexit immigration levels. My guess is this is all media posturing and the Home Office is going to continue rubber-stamping every family reunification and student visa, while judges refuse to deport illegals since they might have to shave their beard (real reason a Tajik was allowed to stay).
As Mark Steyn has pointed out repeatedly, if the will of the people can't be satisfied by the ballot box, the people will be forced to take less acceptable means to achieve it! Cheers to the Danes for listening to their people instead of telling them what to think. Maybe the idea will catch on!
I'll take "Things That will Never Happen" for $1000, Ken.
Shabana Mahmood is a Muslim.
Mohammed and its variations are the top name for boys in the UK.
England's second largest city is Birmingham and it is 40% Muslim.
Britain imported 3-4 million Muslims, mostly Pakis, since 2020.
Starmer's government has been relentless in prosecuting speech criticizing anything Muslim, while letting he Muzzies do what they want. A man was recently told not to walk his dog on a certain street because it might offend the Muzzies.
The Muzzies have been raping white English girls for over 20 years now, and it is still being covered up because no one wants to be racist. Imagine the reaction if the roles were reversed.
Mark Steyn has been banging on about this since the early 2000s. It is probably too late to avoid civil war.
Machine gunning a refugee boat and posting the video online might help.
There is no such thing as "temporary" asylum. People from El Salvador have been on Temporary Protected Status in the US since the late 80s.
The Muzzies now have a foot hold in NYC and Dearborn Michigan.
This will get a lot worse before it gets better.
Don't forget the massive numbers of Somalis in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota and, what, Maine and other places in New England. Those nice Lutheran church ladies—gotta love 'em.
"Machine gunning refugee boats..." I have said for years that if we don't act as they are coming in, we will be forced to act after they are here.
> t comes as a further 1,269 migrants crossed the English Channel in small boats on Thursday and Friday, the latest Home Office figures show. This follows two weeks of bad weather when there were no crossings.
Shabana Mahmood sent officials to Denmark to study its immigration system <
I get annoyed with all this nonsense that this requires careful "study" and all sorts of rules--even reasonable ones like the Danes--are required.
What an absolute crock of shit. There is absolutely no requirement to let *any* foreigners into your country. In fact, it is a dereliction of your duty to your citizens if said foreigner's presence is not a long term benefit to your nation's people. (Which is very rare.)
Simply *do not let them in* ... and the problem completely vanishes. Completely, "small boats" and all.
I saw on X yesterday that the German CD party has agreed to repatriations. Is that official?
Hasn't Germany been paying reparations since the 50's in one way or another? Up to the point where the Russians started to squeeze them Germany was the economic powerhouse of Europe.
We American conservatives like to imagine that we are sane, manly, gun-toting, based normies compared to those wimpy, socialist Euro-weenies.
But while Europe is indeed a mess--collapsing quickly--the polling shows that Europeans are actually much more based about demographics/immigration. Many more Euros seem to have a strong sense of their nation ethnic identity and its importance.
Even in the disastrous UK--which has the misfortune to have be pickled of US minoritarian propaganda since the War and has totalitarian finger waging, church lady elites--people are more based. Conservatives there actually want to stay white and British!
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2025/11/01/overton-window-speedrun-british-voters-now-more-right-wing-on-immigration-than-americans/
And skipping over to the flip side of the Anglo-sphere, in Australia--which is abolishing itself about as fast as Canada--a majority of people of *every political party*--from Pauline Hanson's "One Nation", through the Nats/Libs, through Labor and even the Greens--want less immigration.
https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/latest-newspoll-reveals-almost-twothirds-of-australians-want-fewer-immigrants-in-major-warning-to-albanese-government/news-story/a5b954dbdb15cd978b57420cc3047659
Of course, the Labor government is not going to do that. It claims instead it will "manage the effects" or something. But the *people*--despite all the propaganda--trend somewhat sane.
In contrast in the US, we can muster a majority against *illegal* immigration and Democrat voters--as just demonstrated--are against cooperating with Trump to do even that.
BTW count me as skeptical of anything coming from this government.
This turd Keir Starmer, while he comes across as a bowl of rice pudding with his permanent deer-in-the-headlights look, is an avid true believer in all the "Human Rights" glop. He worked his way up the greasy pole lots of "human rights" lawfare. He's a born yard-signer type. Just loves legalist process.
He turned over the Chagos Islands--to people who have absolutely nothing to do with the Chagos Islanders--because some international busy-body court told him to.
His one-in-one-out deal with France to handle channel invaders is the dumbest "fix" imaginable. Basically when an invader shows up Starmer may send him back to France ... but in return agrees to take in an invader who has filed asylum paperwork in France. In order words--math is hard!--everytime a migrant shows up someone is getting in, even if not that guy.
Starmer is the anti-thesis of a "just do it", "get a wrench and fix the problem" type guy. Starmer would easily be the worst British Prime Minister ever ... if it weren't for all the previous Labor PM's who kicked off and ramped up this immivasion tsunami and all the Tory PMs who did absolutely nothing to stop it.
I’m sure someone named Shabana Mahmood will do everything she can to lower immigration.
I'm certainly all for it. We did a soccer trip and stopped and stadiums in Birmingham and Luton and let's just say we could have been in Karachi and Islamabad.
That being said, I have never seen anyone work harder than Mexican roofers. Dawn to past dusk. They put in a shift. Conversely, i hired the lowest bidder to install patio pavers. The white laborer was an hour late with DTs. <1% chance that dude makes it to 60.
The dudes who dug the Erie canal turned out to be great citizens. The dudes who moved to Rotterdam not so much.
There has to be more choices besides human caravans and armed and masked agents grabbing preschools teachers in front of 3 year olds.
Whatever they do will be a limp wristed half measure intended to fool the populace while keeping the left mostly happy.