On the first point, I’d add, “especially if he was wearing any kind of ear protection, as someone with his background familiarity with firearms ought to have done.”
It was a large crowd and audio where everyone could hear. Not implausable. Possibly knew the person who asked the question and this was prearranged. Odd coincidence when he could have shot earlier. So Mick, why did the shooter wait. There's every reason for doing it as soon as he could. Yes?
He almost certainly didn’t know the person who asked the question — that person was interviewed in the NYT. If the Times identified him, surely investigators did too, and if there was a connection we would know.
It was not a difficult shot for someone with some training. My NC buddy told me he can put three rounds into a 2 inch circle using the same scoped rifle at 300 yards.
The assassin reportedly was bragging to friends about what a great long distance shooter he was, but he forgot about, you know, gravity dragging the bullet down and his shot aimed at CK's head hit him in the neck instead.
How about a trial next week resulting in a death penalty conviction and sentence is carried out by a firing squad on live TV next month.
He’s not killed someone before, my guess is it took him 20 minutes to build up the courage to do what he’d planned to do. The trans question is probably what did it for him.
See also Matt Walsh, warning that transvestites are killers, here: https://youtu.be/xSRfnpEl17w - he was prescient.
“In Matt Walsh’s podcast episode, he condemns transgender ideology as a dangerous, delusional construct fueling a purported epidemic of violence, exemplified by a recent shooting at a Catholic school where a trans-identifying individual killed two children and injured others. He argues that media outlets systematically conceal the transgender connection in such crimes, citing cases like Jared Ravizza’s stabbings, where reports omit the perpetrator’s transgender identity despite evident social media evidence. Walsh lists numerous violent incidents involving trans-identifying people, including mass shootings in Maryland, Colorado, Colorado Springs, Philadelphia, Nashville, and a parental murder, asserting that per capita data shows this demographic as the most prone to deadly mass shootings, far exceeding others. He attributes this to the ideology’s promotion of unnatural hormone treatments and affirmation of fantasies, which empower psychopaths rather than treating underlying mental illness, as evidenced by the lack of suicide reduction per ACLU admissions. Walsh criticizes leftist affirmation policies, such as family and political support for the recent shooter, for exacerbating delusions and inciting anti-Christian hatred, seen in the perpetrator’s mockery of God and targeting of a church. He accuses Democrats, including Minnesota’s lieutenant governor with her knife-emblazoned “Protect trans kids” shirt, of issuing veiled threats and encouraging terrorism, while media like CNN omits transgender details to obscure motives. Politicians and commentators, he claims, exploit tragedies to mock Christian prayer as ineffective, implying the ideology’s anti-Christian core, with figures like Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey, Jen Psaki, and Michael Steele deriding faith amid child deaths. Walsh calls for banning affirmation for all ages, classifying transgenderism as a severe mental disorder, prohibiting firearm sales to such individuals, and eradicating the “demonic” agenda to protect society, warning of escalating desperation as it loses cultural ground.”
Right, and they also drone on and on about violence towards trannies, which is odd, because, so far, I haven't seen any.
I say so far, because that may change.
There is also no discussion of the possible side effects of the drugs trannies must continue to take. Transitioning has been sold as a one time event and then you're fine. It's not.
As Steve has pointed out, a lot of the violence against transgenders is: black guy guy has sex with what he thinks is a woman, find out it's a guy, freaks out and kills him. Not what the media wants to talk about.
It's even more simple: "transwomen" (aka men) are heavily overrepresented in the sex worker cohort. Sex work is incredibly dangerous for anyone who does it & this is doubly or triply true if you are shall we say, engaging in false advertisement?
This makes up the VAST majority of these cases.
The thing is: a lot of these neo-troons are not the trannies most people think of when they think of "transexuals."
This new breed are largely Autogynephiles aka HETEROSEXUAL MEN- who get off on the idea of being a woman.
It's a fetish they are foisting onto the rest of us, & they actually expect us to accept them in women's bathrooms, changing rooms & private (for a reason) spaces, let alone competing against biological women in their sports?
It's all complete rubbish & it also the STUPIDEST argument ever made - it's embarrassing the Western world has entertained this nonsense for a minute.
My take on the transfem prostitutes - they have the sex drive of men - stronger and more indiscriminate than that of women. What they desire is straight men or men who don't identify as gay but do want ladyboys. And the way they get their partners is through paid sex. It is not primarily economic or for survival as it is for female prostitutes. The sex is what's primary.
They claim they can't find jobs because of their female presentation. So, present male to work, go home and be however you wish.
If I had a choice between prostitution or presenting male at work, stick-on Mario moustache it is.
Andy Ngo is way, way out ahead on this story, though he cautions that whether the trans person was Robinson's lover or merely his roommate is not yet clear.
Spencer Cox is very liberal for a Republican governor; I was surprised he "put it all out there" on the Sunday talk shows today.
That said, we have had their lifestyle crammed down our throats for years. My sons were required to specify their pronouns on their college applications. Workers get called into HR if they misgender a co-worker. Now we're being told to NOT call attention to them? No.
Charlie Kirk referred to the Floyd and Ferguson effects and Sailer-endorsed racial crime differentials in the Oxford University debate that had the incoming Union president cheering his murder (“LET’S GO”):
I interpreted the Union prez's tweet as mocking the people calling for prayers when he was still believed to be alive. Still obnoxious and totally graceless for someone who knew him.
The latest wave of trans don’t even want to present as the opposing gender. They actually just want ti be trans and ti belong to the trans community. They would rather you knew they were trans than honestly mistake them for a woman. Lesson in there.
I have no idea whether "trans shooters" are becoming thing. But the inability of most of the MSM to "process" this story has been pretty conspicuous. The alt right X accounts ended up being more right than wrong here (somewhat to my amazement tbh).
From my vantage point we've gone from "shooter was conservative and killed one of his own", to "okay, so he had a trans roommate, yes blame the trans people lol!", to "the inscriptions on the casing tell us very little in the way of motive", to now "sure, the inscriptions point to being sympathetic to trans and anti fascist causes, and maybe he had a trans lover, but I don't see what this has to do with anything."
One can imagine an alternate universe where Kyle kulinski (side note: there really isn't a left wing version of Charlie, is there? Mark Halperin said this and now I believe it) is shot and they find alt right 4chan-esque inscriptions on casings and photos of the shooter with neo-nazi tats, and most of the media goes with "let's be cautious about what the motivations are."
Personally I think it’s probably a superficial reason, but at the bottom of it all is probably a misfit who found a sense of identity and self worth by adopting leftist politics and decided to do something heroic (in his mind). Obviously trans is the primary vector for this as well as his feelings about his alleged partner, and there is no question the most militant trans adherents *do* allege the right has an eliminationist attitude towards them that warrants a violent response - the loon that is the LtG of Minnesota has been smiling wearing a “Protect Trans Kids” t-shirt complete with a knife.
So yes, I do think the entire trans movement relies on emotionally unbalanced and easily manipulated people, but leftist rhetoric in general for years now has equated speech they don’t like with violence that has resulted in stuff like the Dallas cops murdered by a pro BLM black guy.
I don’t think it’s any stretch at all to say the activist left is shot through with people who have massive issues with emotional regulation, and such people cannot simply be treated as fellow citizens with a different political perspective. Politics is just an outlet for mentally unwell people to indulge their worst impulses.
Seeing the shooter as a "leftist" is reductive and ultimately, wrong.
This is horseshoe theory in action but I have made many longish posts abt the reality of this shooter and this killing like 5 times already.
Suffice to say someone who "admired Nick Fuentes" & identified with Groyper meme culture ≠ leftist in any iteration of the term, even the troon obsessed one
For a detailed analysis of transgenderism, and a call for the prosecution of those responsible for propagating it, please see: https://paste.rs/dr2jJ.md
ABSTRACT:
This article examines transgender ideology as a biologically unfounded construct that challenges the immutability of sex, defined as binary and determined by chromosomal and reproductive biology. It argues that medical interventions, such as hormone treatments and surgeries, provide only cosmetic alterations, incapable of changing fundamental sex characteristics. Drawing on historical figures like Dr Georges Burou and detransitioner accounts, such as Alan Finch's description of surgery as "genital mutilation," the piece contends that such procedures stem from delusions or paraphilias, notably autogynephilia—a sexual fetish involving arousal from imagining oneself as female.
The analysis rejects the distinction between sex and gender, viewing the latter as an incoherent sociopolitical invention critiqued in works by Helen Joyce, Abigail Shrier, and Kathleen Stock. It identifies drivers of the ideology, including adult male fetishes (e.g., autogynephilia in figures like Andrea Chu), online grooming leading to rapid-onset gender dysphoria in adolescents, profit-driven medical industries, male athletes exploiting women's sports, sex offenders accessing female spaces, and political opportunism by Democrats and Labour supporters seeking moral validation.
Societal harms are emphasised, encompassing the grooming, chemical sterilisation, and surgical mutilation of children, with reference to the Cass Review's findings on weak evidence for benefits and reports of 5,700 minors operated on in the U.S. between 2019 and 2023. Additional impacts include the erosion of women's sports through over 578 male victories, and safety risks in single-sex facilities, exemplified by assaults by individuals like Karen White and Darren Merager. Critiques of "gender-affirming care" incorporate analyses of U.S. v. Skrmetti Supreme Court arguments, debunking claims of reversibility and mental health benefits, and Corinna Cohn's Substack essay exposing false moderation in advocacy.
Counterarguments dismissing concerns as hatred or peripheral are refuted, prioritising evidence-based policy over personal apathy. Analogies, such as pretending to be a walrus or trans-zebra, illustrate the absurdity of affirming delusions, echoed in Matt Walsh's works. Recommendations urge engagement with critical authors and sites like Reduxx and Transgender Trend.
The article culminates in a call for accountability, advocating prosecutions and executions of doctors, politicians, and enablers under precedents like the Nuremberg Trials (Nuremberg Charter, Article 6(c)), Geneva Conventions, and ICC Rome Statute (Article 7), likening actions to historical atrocities for deterrence. It proposes tribunals and future reconciliation commissions to rectify harms, urging a return to biological reality.
Conspiracy theories that require co-conspirators to stand close to the target of gunfire (e.g., the popular theory that Sirhan Sirhan missed RFK Jr. with all 9 shots but RFK was then shot by second hired gunman standing directly behind RFK) strike me as hard to organize: You want me to stand where?
Thansgenderism is an evil anti-humanist movement driven by autogynephilic men who wank in front of mirrors wearing women's clothing. They push this ideology on confused teens in an attempt to normalize their perversion. Transgenderism is genocide of gay teens. Is it any surprise that so many transgenders are filled with rage against society, against children and the church when they realise the awful truth that they are the agents of their own genocide?
OK, they mention this is furries, but I think it's referring to noticing genital bulges in someone passing as female (thus male)--that would be anti-trans.
OwO are flirting 'big eyes' but usually mocking.
'Hey, fascist! Catch ↑ → ↓↓↓'
This one seems antifascist--the arrows are likely a videogame code (Helldivers) to summon a big bomb.
'Oh bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao'
That one's probably antifascist--it's an Italian partisan song from WW2.
'If you read this, you are gay lmao'
Classic antigay stuff among young men. lmao=laughing my ass off
So two sound left, two sound right, probably two are ironic, I'm not sure which. I can't see a leftist making fun of someone for being gay, but then 'bella ciao' is kind of obscure for a righty mocking a lefty. That this particular combo is chosen to confound people on the Internet trying to figure it out is quite possible.
Supposedly he has a trans lover, which I've heard is bizarrely enough not unheard of among groypers--sometimes those are the only women interested in these guys...
A fully capital OWO, unlike a lowercase owo or mixture of the two (OwO) is an English word that is an initialism of "Oral Without". In prostitution, this signifies performing oral sex on a man without using a condom.
This isn't the reason the weebs and the furries started using it, but it sure is a strange coincidence that the most popular use of it is the "OwO what's dis?" meme, depicting a furry finding a bulge in someone's pants.
Thinking that this is as simple as "left vs right" is a serious mistake. Robinson said he "admired Nick Fuentes" according to authorities - and that Kirk "wasn't conservative enough."
People assume wrongly that the trans gender nonsense is beholden to lefty politics. His roommate, partner whatever he/they/she is or was, was a libertarian & very, VERY active member of the "r/4tran" sub which is a play on "4chan." Not exactly a bastion of left wing political thought.
Let us not forget that he admires the same Nick Fuentes who said "hanging out with...kr even having sex with your girlfriend is really the gayest thing you can do, if you think about it."
Governor Cox was right abt one thing: this kid was totally mired in 7 layers of irony, Gen Z "Internet meme culture" which intersects with the neo-trans movement was has essentially been "memefied" into existence. These guys start watching this sissy porn crap, which ....let's just say its STRANGE. I've researched this a ton as I see the troon movement as a new, degenerate "men's rights" movement in many ways - & yes, I know a ton of young women are buying into this now, too.
I'm specifically referencing the wave of ostensibly straight and/or "questioning" young men who are being hijacked by Internet culture+ porn & video game addiction.
Go ahead & watch Fuentes on Rumble on any weekday - and monitor the live chat.
You'll see EXACTLY what I am referring to.
We all need to get out of our left/right thinking - so much of what is out there, right under our noses but obscure enough that most older people just don't get it & wouldn't know it IF they saw it - defies our traditional political structures.
Normally you're more acute with phrasing, but this "he was killed by the transgender movement" is a pretty facile conclusion to reach if you're not going to apply it to all terrorists and their various pet causes.
On the trans assassination link, any trend feels very preliminary. I wouldn't be surprised if a group already connected with various mental illness, and with reason to be on guard from constant ego injury and identity based derealization, would not also be much more likely to lash out in violence than the rest of us. But the data set is small and we don't even have a good grasp on the current population size we are dealing with and their different sub-types.
Highly doubtful the shooter could’ve heard Charlie from 200 yards away, or that he timed the shot to a
particular comment.
On the first point, I’d add, “especially if he was wearing any kind of ear protection, as someone with his background familiarity with firearms ought to have done.”
Or you slip one ear protector off your ear until year hear a transgender question, then put it back in place and go to work?
My hearing protection has a switch. It uses a microphone to pump in outside sound until you flick the switch then it's down 30db
If it wasn’t officially live-streamed then anyone in the audience could have been streaming it. The shooter did have a phone on him.
There was someone near Kirk who made what looked to be hand signals shortly before he was shot.
It was a large crowd and audio where everyone could hear. Not implausable. Possibly knew the person who asked the question and this was prearranged. Odd coincidence when he could have shot earlier. So Mick, why did the shooter wait. There's every reason for doing it as soon as he could. Yes?
He almost certainly didn’t know the person who asked the question — that person was interviewed in the NYT. If the Times identified him, surely investigators did too, and if there was a connection we would know.
This seems premeditated.
He might have known his opinion from an earlier time.
It was a big event. Did they not have PAs?
It was not a difficult shot for someone with some training. My NC buddy told me he can put three rounds into a 2 inch circle using the same scoped rifle at 300 yards.
The assassin reportedly was bragging to friends about what a great long distance shooter he was, but he forgot about, you know, gravity dragging the bullet down and his shot aimed at CK's head hit him in the neck instead.
How about a trial next week resulting in a death penalty conviction and sentence is carried out by a firing squad on live TV next month.
He’s not killed someone before, my guess is it took him 20 minutes to build up the courage to do what he’d planned to do. The trans question is probably what did it for him.
See also Matt Walsh, warning that transvestites are killers, here: https://youtu.be/xSRfnpEl17w - he was prescient.
“In Matt Walsh’s podcast episode, he condemns transgender ideology as a dangerous, delusional construct fueling a purported epidemic of violence, exemplified by a recent shooting at a Catholic school where a trans-identifying individual killed two children and injured others. He argues that media outlets systematically conceal the transgender connection in such crimes, citing cases like Jared Ravizza’s stabbings, where reports omit the perpetrator’s transgender identity despite evident social media evidence. Walsh lists numerous violent incidents involving trans-identifying people, including mass shootings in Maryland, Colorado, Colorado Springs, Philadelphia, Nashville, and a parental murder, asserting that per capita data shows this demographic as the most prone to deadly mass shootings, far exceeding others. He attributes this to the ideology’s promotion of unnatural hormone treatments and affirmation of fantasies, which empower psychopaths rather than treating underlying mental illness, as evidenced by the lack of suicide reduction per ACLU admissions. Walsh criticizes leftist affirmation policies, such as family and political support for the recent shooter, for exacerbating delusions and inciting anti-Christian hatred, seen in the perpetrator’s mockery of God and targeting of a church. He accuses Democrats, including Minnesota’s lieutenant governor with her knife-emblazoned “Protect trans kids” shirt, of issuing veiled threats and encouraging terrorism, while media like CNN omits transgender details to obscure motives. Politicians and commentators, he claims, exploit tragedies to mock Christian prayer as ineffective, implying the ideology’s anti-Christian core, with figures like Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey, Jen Psaki, and Michael Steele deriding faith amid child deaths. Walsh calls for banning affirmation for all ages, classifying transgenderism as a severe mental disorder, prohibiting firearm sales to such individuals, and eradicating the “demonic” agenda to protect society, warning of escalating desperation as it loses cultural ground.”
Right, and they also drone on and on about violence towards trannies, which is odd, because, so far, I haven't seen any.
I say so far, because that may change.
There is also no discussion of the possible side effects of the drugs trannies must continue to take. Transitioning has been sold as a one time event and then you're fine. It's not.
Indeed. Please see here for a more detailed analysis: https://paste.rs/dr2jJ.md
As Steve has pointed out, a lot of the violence against transgenders is: black guy guy has sex with what he thinks is a woman, find out it's a guy, freaks out and kills him. Not what the media wants to talk about.
Hugh Grant to the white courtesy phone, please. Hugh Grant.
Eddy Murphy to the white courtesy phone, please. Eddy Murphy.
It's even more simple: "transwomen" (aka men) are heavily overrepresented in the sex worker cohort. Sex work is incredibly dangerous for anyone who does it & this is doubly or triply true if you are shall we say, engaging in false advertisement?
This makes up the VAST majority of these cases.
The thing is: a lot of these neo-troons are not the trannies most people think of when they think of "transexuals."
This new breed are largely Autogynephiles aka HETEROSEXUAL MEN- who get off on the idea of being a woman.
It's a fetish they are foisting onto the rest of us, & they actually expect us to accept them in women's bathrooms, changing rooms & private (for a reason) spaces, let alone competing against biological women in their sports?
It's all complete rubbish & it also the STUPIDEST argument ever made - it's embarrassing the Western world has entertained this nonsense for a minute.
My take on the transfem prostitutes - they have the sex drive of men - stronger and more indiscriminate than that of women. What they desire is straight men or men who don't identify as gay but do want ladyboys. And the way they get their partners is through paid sex. It is not primarily economic or for survival as it is for female prostitutes. The sex is what's primary.
They claim they can't find jobs because of their female presentation. So, present male to work, go home and be however you wish.
If I had a choice between prostitution or presenting male at work, stick-on Mario moustache it is.
Andy Ngo is way, way out ahead on this story, though he cautions that whether the trans person was Robinson's lover or merely his roommate is not yet clear.
Yes and no.
He has a serious bias and that is evidenced by what he wrote (and what he conveniently left out) in his post today.
Spencer Cox is very liberal for a Republican governor; I was surprised he "put it all out there" on the Sunday talk shows today.
That said, we have had their lifestyle crammed down our throats for years. My sons were required to specify their pronouns on their college applications. Workers get called into HR if they misgender a co-worker. Now we're being told to NOT call attention to them? No.
How lazy are you with this?
Charlie Kirk referred to the Floyd and Ferguson effects and Sailer-endorsed racial crime differentials in the Oxford University debate that had the incoming Union president cheering his murder (“LET’S GO”):
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mlh_GfHmwts&pp=ygUTY2hhcmxpZSBraXJrIG94Zm9yZA%3D%3D
I interpreted the Union prez's tweet as mocking the people calling for prayers when he was still believed to be alive. Still obnoxious and totally graceless for someone who knew him.
The latest wave of trans don’t even want to present as the opposing gender. They actually just want ti be trans and ti belong to the trans community. They would rather you knew they were trans than honestly mistake them for a woman. Lesson in there.
I have no idea whether "trans shooters" are becoming thing. But the inability of most of the MSM to "process" this story has been pretty conspicuous. The alt right X accounts ended up being more right than wrong here (somewhat to my amazement tbh).
From my vantage point we've gone from "shooter was conservative and killed one of his own", to "okay, so he had a trans roommate, yes blame the trans people lol!", to "the inscriptions on the casing tell us very little in the way of motive", to now "sure, the inscriptions point to being sympathetic to trans and anti fascist causes, and maybe he had a trans lover, but I don't see what this has to do with anything."
One can imagine an alternate universe where Kyle kulinski (side note: there really isn't a left wing version of Charlie, is there? Mark Halperin said this and now I believe it) is shot and they find alt right 4chan-esque inscriptions on casings and photos of the shooter with neo-nazi tats, and most of the media goes with "let's be cautious about what the motivations are."
Seems borderline unfathomable to me.
Personally I think it’s probably a superficial reason, but at the bottom of it all is probably a misfit who found a sense of identity and self worth by adopting leftist politics and decided to do something heroic (in his mind). Obviously trans is the primary vector for this as well as his feelings about his alleged partner, and there is no question the most militant trans adherents *do* allege the right has an eliminationist attitude towards them that warrants a violent response - the loon that is the LtG of Minnesota has been smiling wearing a “Protect Trans Kids” t-shirt complete with a knife.
So yes, I do think the entire trans movement relies on emotionally unbalanced and easily manipulated people, but leftist rhetoric in general for years now has equated speech they don’t like with violence that has resulted in stuff like the Dallas cops murdered by a pro BLM black guy.
I don’t think it’s any stretch at all to say the activist left is shot through with people who have massive issues with emotional regulation, and such people cannot simply be treated as fellow citizens with a different political perspective. Politics is just an outlet for mentally unwell people to indulge their worst impulses.
Seeing the shooter as a "leftist" is reductive and ultimately, wrong.
This is horseshoe theory in action but I have made many longish posts abt the reality of this shooter and this killing like 5 times already.
Suffice to say someone who "admired Nick Fuentes" & identified with Groyper meme culture ≠ leftist in any iteration of the term, even the troon obsessed one
For a detailed analysis of transgenderism, and a call for the prosecution of those responsible for propagating it, please see: https://paste.rs/dr2jJ.md
ABSTRACT:
This article examines transgender ideology as a biologically unfounded construct that challenges the immutability of sex, defined as binary and determined by chromosomal and reproductive biology. It argues that medical interventions, such as hormone treatments and surgeries, provide only cosmetic alterations, incapable of changing fundamental sex characteristics. Drawing on historical figures like Dr Georges Burou and detransitioner accounts, such as Alan Finch's description of surgery as "genital mutilation," the piece contends that such procedures stem from delusions or paraphilias, notably autogynephilia—a sexual fetish involving arousal from imagining oneself as female.
The analysis rejects the distinction between sex and gender, viewing the latter as an incoherent sociopolitical invention critiqued in works by Helen Joyce, Abigail Shrier, and Kathleen Stock. It identifies drivers of the ideology, including adult male fetishes (e.g., autogynephilia in figures like Andrea Chu), online grooming leading to rapid-onset gender dysphoria in adolescents, profit-driven medical industries, male athletes exploiting women's sports, sex offenders accessing female spaces, and political opportunism by Democrats and Labour supporters seeking moral validation.
Societal harms are emphasised, encompassing the grooming, chemical sterilisation, and surgical mutilation of children, with reference to the Cass Review's findings on weak evidence for benefits and reports of 5,700 minors operated on in the U.S. between 2019 and 2023. Additional impacts include the erosion of women's sports through over 578 male victories, and safety risks in single-sex facilities, exemplified by assaults by individuals like Karen White and Darren Merager. Critiques of "gender-affirming care" incorporate analyses of U.S. v. Skrmetti Supreme Court arguments, debunking claims of reversibility and mental health benefits, and Corinna Cohn's Substack essay exposing false moderation in advocacy.
Counterarguments dismissing concerns as hatred or peripheral are refuted, prioritising evidence-based policy over personal apathy. Analogies, such as pretending to be a walrus or trans-zebra, illustrate the absurdity of affirming delusions, echoed in Matt Walsh's works. Recommendations urge engagement with critical authors and sites like Reduxx and Transgender Trend.
The article culminates in a call for accountability, advocating prosecutions and executions of doctors, politicians, and enablers under precedents like the Nuremberg Trials (Nuremberg Charter, Article 6(c)), Geneva Conventions, and ICC Rome Statute (Article 7), likening actions to historical atrocities for deterrence. It proposes tribunals and future reconciliation commissions to rectify harms, urging a return to biological reality.
X users with conspiratorial tendencies have identified at least two individuals standing near Mr Kirk as "second shooters".
Conspiracy theories that require co-conspirators to stand close to the target of gunfire (e.g., the popular theory that Sirhan Sirhan missed RFK Jr. with all 9 shots but RFK was then shot by second hired gunman standing directly behind RFK) strike me as hard to organize: You want me to stand where?
Thansgenderism is an evil anti-humanist movement driven by autogynephilic men who wank in front of mirrors wearing women's clothing. They push this ideology on confused teens in an attempt to normalize their perversion. Transgenderism is genocide of gay teens. Is it any surprise that so many transgenders are filled with rage against society, against children and the church when they realise the awful truth that they are the agents of their own genocide?
He doesn't have a manifesto, but he does have bullet casings:
https://news.sky.com/story/bella-ciao-to-owo-what-do-the-engravings-on-the-bullets-in-the-charlie-kirk-shooting-mean-13430554
“Notices bulges OwO what’s this?”
OK, they mention this is furries, but I think it's referring to noticing genital bulges in someone passing as female (thus male)--that would be anti-trans.
OwO are flirting 'big eyes' but usually mocking.
'Hey, fascist! Catch ↑ → ↓↓↓'
This one seems antifascist--the arrows are likely a videogame code (Helldivers) to summon a big bomb.
'Oh bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao'
That one's probably antifascist--it's an Italian partisan song from WW2.
'If you read this, you are gay lmao'
Classic antigay stuff among young men. lmao=laughing my ass off
So two sound left, two sound right, probably two are ironic, I'm not sure which. I can't see a leftist making fun of someone for being gay, but then 'bella ciao' is kind of obscure for a righty mocking a lefty. That this particular combo is chosen to confound people on the Internet trying to figure it out is quite possible.
Supposedly he has a trans lover, which I've heard is bizarrely enough not unheard of among groypers--sometimes those are the only women interested in these guys...
See my comment.
Top definition of "OWO" at UrbanDictionary:
«««
OWO
A fully capital OWO, unlike a lowercase owo or mixture of the two (OwO) is an English word that is an initialism of "Oral Without". In prostitution, this signifies performing oral sex on a man without using a condom.
This isn't the reason the weebs and the furries started using it, but it sure is a strange coincidence that the most popular use of it is the "OwO what's dis?" meme, depicting a furry finding a bulge in someone's pants.
OWO or OW?
by lithikitty November 23, 2018
»»»
http://owo.urbanup.com/13386703
See also: https://x.com/DineshDSouza/status/1966937493061988679
«««
Pericles
@PerryALPHA
Replying to @PopBase
"notices bulge OWO" means that Tyler Robinson is a chaser (also known as GAMP).
He is a man who is sexually attracted to transgenders
10:48 AM • 12 sep 25
»»»
So no, it's not anti-trans. It's pro-trans-furry-weeb, which coincidentally seems to be a concise description of his boyfriend:
https://x.com/LauraLoomer/status/1966958727338029487
Thinking that this is as simple as "left vs right" is a serious mistake. Robinson said he "admired Nick Fuentes" according to authorities - and that Kirk "wasn't conservative enough."
People assume wrongly that the trans gender nonsense is beholden to lefty politics. His roommate, partner whatever he/they/she is or was, was a libertarian & very, VERY active member of the "r/4tran" sub which is a play on "4chan." Not exactly a bastion of left wing political thought.
Let us not forget that he admires the same Nick Fuentes who said "hanging out with...kr even having sex with your girlfriend is really the gayest thing you can do, if you think about it."
Governor Cox was right abt one thing: this kid was totally mired in 7 layers of irony, Gen Z "Internet meme culture" which intersects with the neo-trans movement was has essentially been "memefied" into existence. These guys start watching this sissy porn crap, which ....let's just say its STRANGE. I've researched this a ton as I see the troon movement as a new, degenerate "men's rights" movement in many ways - & yes, I know a ton of young women are buying into this now, too.
I'm specifically referencing the wave of ostensibly straight and/or "questioning" young men who are being hijacked by Internet culture+ porn & video game addiction.
Go ahead & watch Fuentes on Rumble on any weekday - and monitor the live chat.
You'll see EXACTLY what I am referring to.
We all need to get out of our left/right thinking - so much of what is out there, right under our noses but obscure enough that most older people just don't get it & wouldn't know it IF they saw it - defies our traditional political structures.
Well, thank you for explaining this.
I was vaguely aware of the transgender alt-right and transgender femboys, but didn't think it was more than a fringe.
How is this a 'men's rights' movement?
Normally you're more acute with phrasing, but this "he was killed by the transgender movement" is a pretty facile conclusion to reach if you're not going to apply it to all terrorists and their various pet causes.
On the trans assassination link, any trend feels very preliminary. I wouldn't be surprised if a group already connected with various mental illness, and with reason to be on guard from constant ego injury and identity based derealization, would not also be much more likely to lash out in violence than the rest of us. But the data set is small and we don't even have a good grasp on the current population size we are dealing with and their different sub-types.
Government action. He wasn't killed, he's been moved out of the way.