Nice friendly videos with a great PBS vibe. If Trump cannot defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, maybe he should put you in charge of it.
Question: do any of these studies of subgroups provide more than the average IQ? That is, are their IQs normally distributed using the world IQ scale and are their standard deviations the same number of IQ points as the world normed scale?
I remember The Bell Curve said Asians, Eskimos and American Indians performed better at Spatial intelligence than verbal intelligence. The opposite was true for Jews apparently. I don't remember any details about whether standard deviations differed from one subgroup to another.
The reason why race and crime and race and intelligence are such difficult issues is because, in essence, you're telling an individual who is part of a high crime and low IQ group that his or her relatives are a bunch of thugs and dummies. Nobody is trying to hear that even if it's true. This is why our side's public rhetoric around the matter needs to be carefully crafted.
I’m envisioning the editorial board of The Times and the Guardian being strapped into armchairs and forced to view your videos. I also like the early-1970s educational video vibe. Well done.
Despite your “advanced age”, you’re still a pretty smart cookie.
Nice friendly videos with a great PBS vibe. If Trump cannot defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, maybe he should put you in charge of it.
Question: do any of these studies of subgroups provide more than the average IQ? That is, are their IQs normally distributed using the world IQ scale and are their standard deviations the same number of IQ points as the world normed scale?
I remember The Bell Curve said Asians, Eskimos and American Indians performed better at Spatial intelligence than verbal intelligence. The opposite was true for Jews apparently. I don't remember any details about whether standard deviations differed from one subgroup to another.
The reason why race and crime and race and intelligence are such difficult issues is because, in essence, you're telling an individual who is part of a high crime and low IQ group that his or her relatives are a bunch of thugs and dummies. Nobody is trying to hear that even if it's true. This is why our side's public rhetoric around the matter needs to be carefully crafted.
I’m envisioning the editorial board of The Times and the Guardian being strapped into armchairs and forced to view your videos. I also like the early-1970s educational video vibe. Well done.
Despite your “advanced age”, you’re still a pretty smart cookie.