Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tell's avatar

A good article! A few notes to add:

--Go to any country outside the West and people take differences in intelligence for granted. Go to, say, Kuwait, and everyone takes for granted that Africans aren't as smart as they are. You need a constant, daily expenditure of money and oppression to make people say that water runs upward when they can see that it doesn't.

--The proof that we are right about IQ and so many other things is that whenever the oppression is loosened, belief in the truth comes rushing back like you'd opened the floodgates. Look at the return of conservative and nativist thinking in Russia as soon as Soviet all-are-the-same dogma disappeared.

--There is an excellent book from 1999 called Easily Led: A History of Propaganda, by Oliver Thomson. I think Sailer would love it. It has tons of examples of how to shape public opinion, and sadly it's more about symbolism than facts. Actually, it's not so much about convincing people, but about showing them what they better subscribe to, or else. For example, the first time the emperor's picture was put on the Roman coins, so that suddenly everyone had his image, in a world mostly void of pictures. Or making everyone go to church every week even when they didn't understand the Latin sermon. Or public shaming by the Red Guards. Making everyone use propaganda words instead of the real words - a constant show of force. Symbolism, shaming, show of force. But the author Thomson acknowledges that the truth is a powerful factor in itself, when he says that the usurper needs more propaganda to claim that he has a right to the throne.

--Sadly, it takes courage to believe in the truth, and also interest, not just intelligence. Courage is in short supply. And there is physical courage and social courage, and we can easily see how there is more of the first than the latter: Almost all people would rather go die in an unjust war than say no and be imprisoned for a while, and shamed, along with the family.

--In college I listened to a speech by a rhetoric consultant. He said that 60% of people's beliefs are based on authority (ethos), 30% on emotions (pathos) and only 10% on facts (logos). For those few of us who base most of our beliefs on facts that is a tough pill to swallow.

(He called it Logos, Pathos and Ethos. But I put the depressing logos at the end, for a dramatic finish. See, even now I automatically follow the rules for capturing people's attention, rather than just writing the facts. Just like putting "--" before every point made, or likening things to water and floodgates.)

Expand full comment
Graham Cunningham's avatar

I think part of the problem that Murray has - in common with all of us recusants from the Social Justice religion - is that we have never really managed to quite pin down a comprehensive overview of the hugely seductive psychological complex that underpins the religion. Because, of course, race unrealism is just one part of the mix that makes up the whole fairytale of it. TS Eliot's weary observation about the unbearableness of reality for much of humankind is part of the answer. And I keep trying to get to the heart of it in my essays in Slouching Towards Bethlehem but I never feel sure I've quite got to the core of it either.

Expand full comment
97 more comments...

No posts