Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Drew S.'s avatar

I found interesting the bit about male college athletes in elite schools being more generous donors and more sentimental about the ol' alma mater than women athetes.

I went to a Catholic all-boys high school in the south side of Chicago in the late 70s (in some part because you had to be crazy, or really financially strapped to send your child to a Chicago public school in that area). My high school was made up of cops' sons, plumbers' sons, steelworkers' sons. My friends got a good education and have done extremely well in life. Extremely well.

My wife, not coincidentally, went to an all-girls Catholic high school in the same area.

We retain many friends from those circles, most went to college locally, everyone stayed in touch.

Even though these friends now reside in upper-middle class to upper-class suburbs, almost all of my (male) high school friends sent their children to private Catholics schools. And none of my wife's friends did. Not one. It's a thing.

Expand full comment
Ex-banker's avatar

While this would need some kind of antitrust expemption, limiting the number of schools (six?) students could apply to would be beneficial to the process. Rich kids toss in huge numbers hoping for the big fish and poorer kids do the same with universally granted fee-waivers. Schools like it because the large pool inflates the perception of exclusivity. It also creates a kabuki dance where admissions committees spend time weighing the likelihood that the offer is accepted as part of their admissions decision as they look to maximize their yield (share of accepted students enrolling).

Fewer, more individualized applications would enable serious students to demonstrate thier particular interest in a school and also allow the admissions staff to seriously evaluate the application.

Expand full comment
46 more comments...

No posts